Despite their ‘green’ image, electric cars are often less efficient and more polluting than the petrol cars they replace, according to a new report.
The 168-page report, titled The Emperor’s New Car, is described as a ‘long-overdue reality check’ by its author, car expert Clive Matthew-Wilson. The report was prepared in consultation with several internationally-recognized energy experts.
Matthew-Wilson, who edits the car buyers’ Dog & Lemon Guide, says: “The car industry is selling a false image of efficient, environmentally-friendly electric cars powered by ‘green’ energy. In reality, electric cars often aren’t very efficient and aren’t very green.”
The report was highly critical of the iconic Tesla electric sports car, which has become the international symbol of chic, environmentally-responsible motoring.
- “The Tesla is actually not very efficient at all. Most of Tesla’s publicity focuses on the efficiency of its electric motor. What they don’t tell you is that its batteries are heavy, inefficient and that Teslas are frequently powered by electricity from highly polluting power stations.”
- “Despite what most people believe, a high percentage of the world’s electricity is produced using dirty fuels like coal. This isn’t going to change anytime soon; in fact, the widespread introduction of electric cars will probably increase the world’s reliance on coal in order to keep up with the increased demand for electricity.”
- “Claims that electric cars are ‘emissions-free’ are simply a lie; they merely transfer the pollution from the road to the power station. Not only will electric cars not reduce emissions, they may actually increase emissions, because burning coal to make electricity to power an electric car creates more pollution than if you simply powered the same vehicle using petrol.”
- “Renewable energy sources may be growing fast, but they’re still a tiny percentage of the world’s electricity supply and they’ll stay that way for the foreseeable future, because renewable energy sources tend to be far more expensive than fossil fuels.”
The report compared the Tesla Roadster to a petrol-powered Lotus Elise sports car. Because the Tesla is essentially an electric version of the Lotus Elise, it was possible to directly compare the electric and petrol versions of the same vehicle, says Matthew-Wilson.
In four of the five countries surveyed, the Tesla electric car was less efficient and more polluting than its petrol sibling. Only in New Zealand – where the majority of electricity is produced by hydroelectric generation – was the Tesla ‘greener’ than the Lotus Elise.
According to the report, “In four of the five countries surveyed, the Tesla electric car was less efficient and more polluting than its petrol sibling. Only in New Zealand – where the majority of electricity is produced by hydroelectric generation – was the Tesla ‘greener’ than the Elise. However, a New Zealand scientist recently predicted that if the New Zealand car fleet was replaced with electric cars, the country would probably need to build coal power stations to meet the increased demand.”
The report suggests that China is likely to be the main beneficiary of the electric car movement. Due to massive government investment, China is likely to be the first country to mass-produce electric cars at prices that are competitive with conventional petrol and diesel engines. However, these cars are likely to be produced using environmentally destructive materials, in factories that are powered by non-renewable and heavily polluting forms of energy.
So what’s Matthew-Wilson’s solution to the global energy crisis?
- “There’s no quick fix to either the energy shortage or climate change. In the longer term, we’re all going to have to use less energy, and that means smaller houses, less plastic junk that we don’t really need and less wasted trips in our cars.”
- “Most of the world’s alternative energy industry is based on quick fixes to the current system. In reality, most of this technology either isn’t economic, doesn’t work, or simply doesn’t exist and isn’t going to exist anytime soon.”
- “It disturbs me to see politicians and business leaders on television promoting fantasy technology using fantasy economics.”
- “If we make decisions based on the wrong assumptions, we’re just going to make things worse.”
Some praise The Emperor’s New Car
A number of leading scientists and energy experts have praised The Emperor’s New Car report.Internationally-respected energy expert Robert Rapier says, “Like most people, I used to believe in a future fleet of highly efficient electric vehicles, powered by renewable energy. But I also believe in hard facts, and this report strongly suggests that the truth may be very different than the ideal I had imagined; that electric cars will be actually be dirtier than the vehicles they’re supposed to be replacing.”
google_ad_client = "pub-7703542917199961";
/* 200x200, created 12/8/09 */
google_ad_slot = "7950368454";
google_ad_width = 200;
google_ad_height = 200;
Vehicle scientist Chris Coxon, the former technical chair of the Australian New Car Assessment Program, says, “Matthew-Wilson’s skeptical scientific analysis raises serious questions about the most basic assumptions behind the electric car movement. Many people will disagree with his conclusions, but you can’t ignore the sheer weight of facts that he has gathered to support his case.This report is not only scientifically sound, it is clearly written and well researched. Using nothing but scientific data, Matthew-Wilson has effectively pulled the rug out from under the electric car movement.”
Professor John Storey, a physicist with the University of New South Walesin Australia, says, “I don’t agree with all of the report’s conclusions, but I do believe that the report is well researched and well-documented, with verifiable references. It is certainly scientifically credible.”
Gary Bold, honorary Associate Professor of Physics at the University of Auckland says, “Matthew-Wilson’s report is the first, reasonably non-technical but exhaustive survey of the complete energy-related issues surrounding electric car technologies that I’ve seen. It’s supported by a host of hypertext-linked references to his sources, which alone make the document a valuable resource. He quotes numbers and makes comparisons. The conclusions he draws are convincing. Read it and judge for yourself”.
- European greens: ‘Power EVs with renewables’
- EV-ers must walk the green walk
- Report: EVs + renewables = no air pollution
- Ten reasons EV/PHEVs + renewables = revolution