As the sun has dropped in the sky and the days have gotten shorter and shorter, so too has our solar production.
Not surprising. That’s the nature of the sun as an energy source, or really of the earth as a planet which rotates as it orbits the sun.
Still, our solar production, and the monthly drop in that production, is interesting to examine – at least for those of us who are “solar-heads”.
So here’s a brief look at what’s happened to the production of our 5.59 kW home solar system as we’ve moved from a peak sun month like July to a sun’s-very-low-in-the-sky-plus-it’s-cloudier month like December.
It’s interesting, and heartening, to note that so far, in the almost six months our 5.59 kW system has been online here in Aurora, Colo. it’s exceeded the monthly projections REC Solar charted for us – by quite a bit.
Solar system “over”-performing
Of course, REC Solar told us that it tends to underestimate total annual production in order to account for variability in weather as well as a certain amount of uncertainty about how a given system will perform. It might also have to do with making customers feel better when they see their system “over”-perform.
This approach has worked in our case 😉
In the five full months for which we have data for your system (which officially went online on June 28, 2010), it’s produced 598 kWh more than REC Solar predicted it would. In September of this year, it pumped out a whopping 192 kWh than predicted.
Of course, “extra” production has dropped quite a bit as the sun has dipped in the sky in the Northern Hemisphere. In November, we produced only 74 kWh more than predicted. December’s “extra” margin is likely to be similar that.
Production in December lowest
As our monthly production has inevitably dropped, so too has our ability to bank what we call Sun Miles® — miles driven by an electric vehicle (EV) or plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) whose batteries have been charged using solar energy and/or using electricity from kWh credits amassed via solar offset generation — or, put differently, our monthly kWh net has dropped.
It’s interesting, and heartening, to note that so far, in the almost six months our 5.59 kW system has been online here in Aurora, Colo. it’s exceeded the monthly projections REC Solar charted for us – by quite a bit.
However, we’ve still managed a plus kWh net so far in December – the lowest sun production month of the year, albeit a small one. We’ll probably make 80 kWh more than we use this December.
{googleAds}
<div style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7703542917199961";
/* 200x200,
created 12/8/09 */
google_ad_slot = "7950368454";
google_ad_width
= 200;
google_ad_height = 200;
//-->
</script>
<script
type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
{/googleAds}
Below is a table overview of our solar production so far. Below this are screen shots of our monthly solar production as charted on Google PowerMeter (but only from Sept. – Dec. – we didn’t have PowerMeter in July and August). That data is pushed to PowerMeter by our TED (The Energy Detective) system.
Unfortunately, with TED and Google PowerMeter, which measure both electricity production and home use, you cannot easily publish only your solar production data to the web. You’re forced to publish all of your data. This is a huge shortcoming, one that we hope will be addressed by TED and Google in the future so that we can easily publish our solar system’s production live to SolarChargedDriving.Com. [We don’t want to publish our home electricity use live to the web for obvious security reasons]
Month | Predicted Solar Production | Actual Solar Production | Net Electricity Production |
July | 832 kWh | 924 kWh | +684 kWh |
August | 781 kWh | 937 kWh | +707 kWh |
September | 698 kWh | 890 kWh | +650 kWh |
October | 626 kWh | 710 kWh | +440 kWh |
November | 466 kWh | 540 kWh | +210 kWh |
December | 463 kWh | 500 kWh (estimate) | +80 kWh |
How does our monthly drop in kWh production from mid-summer to mid-winter for our 5.59 kW system located in Aurora, Colo. compare to yours?
Related articles–>